Podcast: Download (Duration: 13:12 — 12.1MB)
Subscribe: More
I love Abhi’s language about the “hyphenated space between perspectives.” It really speaks to me and gives me hope for a more accepting and just world. —LD
In a review of a Star Trek movie, eleventh in the series of epic films, Natalia Anatova, editor of Global Comment writes:
There is something particularly eerie and vulnerable about . . . the threshold of exploration . . . : [where] a human body is suspended in space, graceful and horrible, seconds after being ripped from the safety of its ship.
For most of my life I have inhabited two worlds like a human hyphen in that final frontier of faith, suspended outside the safety of my ship.
Growing up in India, I felt like a social outcast, a cultural hyphen, a religious hybrid: an only child of a short-lived marriage between a lower-caste Muslim father and an upper-caste Hindu mother. So it was for me, being raised by my mother and maternal grandfather who became my surrogate father, learning a language and culture different from my own, hailing from a working class family, and yet having the audacity to fall in love and marry a girl from a traditional Hindu family.
Despite my best efforts to blend in—I became a devout Hindu, prayed to various deities, went to the temple regularly, and even wore a sacred mark on my forehead to prove my credentials—I felt isolated from a society that seemed hostile to the values I held dear.
After my beloved and I married, we felt drawn to the Brahmo Samaj, a Unitarian-Hindu religion. That association led me to the International Congress of the International Association for Religious Freedom in Bangalore, where I met, among other Unitarian Universalists, Spencer Lavan, then Dean of Meadville Lombard Theological School in Chicago. Spencer saw something in me that I had not seen in myself and encouraged me to study for the ministry. I took a leap of faith, leaving behind for a time my wife and infant son and my native land.
In the U.S. I felt like a visitor from outer space. I did not know where I fit as a Hindu-Muslim-Indian with a physics degree and a banking career, studying to be a minister in an unfamiliar faith. I did not really belong in the local Indian community either, as my calling put me at odds with all the doctors, engineers, IT professionals, and motel owners. My vocation is still a conversation-stopper each time . I am asked by a fellow Indian: “So, what do you do for a living?”
In the anonymity of Chicago, I wanted to belong—as a natural part of the human landscape, not an aberration to be tolerated. I wanted to be comfortable in the presence of others and know they were comfortable in mine. I did not want to be caught upside down and alone in the fault lines between worlds, cultures, and faiths. And then the late Reverend Frank Robertson, then minister of religious education at the Unitarian Church of Evanston, invited me to his church. Frank gave me the incredible gift of seeing myself as more than just the sum of my identities. He showed me what Unitarian Universalism was all about: a faith open and welcoming to people regardless of ethnicity, theology, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or political affiliation; a faith where theological crossbreeds, cultural mutts, religious hybrids like you and me can struggle and connect in the hyphenated space between perspectives; a faith where being a mutt or a mongrel is not an awful place of last resort but an intentional first choice. Instead of promising a heaven of sameness, Frank invited me into a community of individuals working at creating a heaven on earth.
I have been telling my own story to point out some of the reasons people might have for joining a Unitarian Universalist church. People join:
Not that Unitarian Universalism is the religious equivalent of the Humane Society. That sounds more like a temporary shelter than a life-long haven. Our faith is not a comfy homestead either. Many of us struggle to belong in this faith―as people of color and from minority cultures, as differently-abled people, as gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, queer, questioning people, as Christian theists, pagans, atheists, secular humanists, Hindus, Buddhists, or as Republicans.
It is particularly a struggle for those of us who are people of color or from minority cultures because it is difficult to feel nourished by an aspiration rather than a reality. Many of us find ourselves feeling a deep commitment to the promise of this faith while coming to terms with the frustration about our current reality as a predominantly Euro-American movement.
Yet, we stay. We keep showing up. Why? Because we know we are not alone. Somehow we know that we belong here, and that the struggle to belong is an integral part of belonging.
I have stuck it out, even through doubt and ambivalence, because Unitarian Universalism is the way I want to live my life. My Unitarian Universalism lets me practice my Hindu faith; it helps me be a better Hindu, a better human being. I stay because Unitarian Universalism has a healing message for a broken world yearning for reconciliation and wholeness.
I stay because Unitarian Universalism is committed to working through race and class, heterosexism and ableism, sexism and nativism, though we have much to learn and far to go.
I stay to celebrate my multi-hyphenated identity not so much as an American melting pot but rather a South Indian thali—a selection of tasty dishes in different bowls presented on a single plate. Each dish tastes different, and does not necessarily mix with the next. But they belong together on the same plate because they complement each other in making the meal a satisfying repast.
I stay to find the strength to live honestly among the various interstices of my life; to take responsibility for the ambiguities of my pluralistic identity while seeking common ground with others. But trying to live a life affirming a plurality of identities can be a counter-cultural process. Our culture tends to prefer its citizens to be pure racial types and monolingual people who can be categorized easily as citizen or alien, friend or foe, elect or damned, patriot or terrorist. It often seems to label people as one of us or one of them―no hyphens allowed.
But labels tend to suck the life-force out of society. In seeking a utopian future, people live partly in an imaginary world, dissociated from the fullness of being that eludes them. With no tolerance for the hyphens, humans leave behind too much destruction and express too little love. They create an ethnocentric morality that obliges them to take care only of their own, without providing a place for those on the margins. Ultimately, they create sacred societies instead of holy communities.
Dr. Darrell Fasching, a Professor of Religion at the University of South Florida, describes the difference between the two:
In a sacred society, all who are the same, fitting the description of an ideal type, are considered human and all who are different, all who are aliens and strangers, are taken to be less than human.
In contrast, a holy community is founded on the hospitality to the very strangers that a sacred society rejects. (It has) no sacred center . . . . . because its center and sense of identity lies outside itself—in the stranger.
The center of Unitarian Universalism lies outside of itself, in the stranger, in difference rather than in similarity. In our faith, the margins hold the center.
We are called to create holy communities where strangers are not only welcome but where all are enjoined to do the work of healing and transformation by wrestling with the strangers within themselves.
In Genesis, an important struggle yielded not a curse, but a blessing: “The whole world spoke the same language using the same words.” But when the people built a tower “with its top in the sky, the Lord confused their speech and scattered them all over the earth, so that not one understood the other.” Babel gave us the gift of diversity: a world of strangers called to be in right relationship with one another, striving with humility and compassion to learn one another’s new languages and to create holy communities.
The hope of peaceful co-existence lies in recognizing many kinds of hyphens that express our diverse affiliations as common inhabitants of a wide world, sort of like the cosmic crew of the Starship Enterprise. We are not just passengers, cloistered in cabins on this spaceship earth. As Herbert “Marshall” McLuhan has said, “We are all crew.”
I believe that we are boldly going where no faith has gone before. Despite all the travail, economic uncertainty, and various other crises that threaten to engulf us, we are present at this sacred moment when new life is about to emerge from the womb of the past. What now begins to breathe can become our shared future of mutual openness to accepting others in all their differentness while affirming our common humanity.
Will we recognize the mystery of this possibility? Will we be open to its opportunities to construct a more compassionate, sustainable, and interdependent way of being in relationship with one another and the planet? Do we dare to aspire to a higher level for humanity? Are we willing to let it be beamed up into the light of tomorrow? These are not questions. They are the agendas of today. They are the exciting, irresistible invitations to each of us to abandon prejudgment and stubborn refusals to hear one another more deeply. They are the program and the means for people like you and me who struggle for justice and reconciliation, who are willing to sacrifice to attain a more just and equitable economic order, and who dream of a new global society based on cooperation and peace.
If we join our dreams with the dreams of so many other people, real change is possible; it is the task of our faith to link those dreams and make them a reality.
Quest for Meaning is a program of the Church of the Larger Fellowship (CLF).
As a Unitarian Universalist congregation with no geographical boundary, the CLF creates global spiritual community, rooted in profound love, which cultivates wonder, imagination, and the courage to act.